Angela
My feedback
3 results found
-
78 votesAngela supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 voteAngela shared this idea ·
-
114 votesAngela supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Angela commentedI agree with Kelly's ideal...all answers on Google and other search engines, should be locked until the person pays some kind of fee to view them. Let's say $8. Of that $8, of course 50% should go to the answering expert and Pearl/JA gets the other 50%. There should be another report set up for internet answers only. Any computer savvy person can easily find our answers via different search engines, especially Google. JA/Pearl is GIVING away way too much information to the general public via the internet search engines. Another option is showing 2-3 lines of the answer as a teaser. If a person wants to see the full answer, then they have to pay to view the full answer. Charging $8 is more than reasonable for valuable information.
I agree, and so does many others who have commented on this matter in the past. When an expert receives a poor rating...the expert is the one that does not get paid...There are many times when customers want you to tell them what they want to hear and NOT the truth. I am not here to pacify the customer, but to provide them with accurate information. If a poor service is warranted, I accept it gracefully, however, for the poor ratings that are not, something definitely needs to be done about those.