Law.hut
My feedback
10 results found
-
4 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
2 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
5 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
49 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
7 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
7 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
73 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Law.hut commentedTerrible idea. Pathetic. That would be a drastic change to the site, and one of the biggest draws in my view is that people have no risk. Who will shell out money when they know they will be charged unless someone that works for the site that they are paying is going to judge an answer. And how are moderators supposed to judge good versus bad. I am in Canada Law. Are you going to pay a Canadian lawyer to review every question? The current system allows some to get free answers sure, but the majority of people I fine are willing to pay, if you give a quality answer. Maybe your answers just suck.
-
146 votesLaw.hut supported this idea ·
-
3 votesLaw.hut shared this idea ·
I disagree. This would water down the image of the site overall as offering the best medical information.