Phil Scott
My feedback
7 results found
-
1 votePhil Scott shared this idea ·
-
2 votesPhil Scott shared this idea ·
-
1 votePhil Scott shared this idea ·
-
1 votePhil Scott shared this idea ·
-
1 votePhil Scott shared this idea ·
-
1 votePhil Scott shared this idea ·
-
157 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
That would be a very good idea.... it would show that 8 or 9 out of 10 negatives are a result of the customer being mad with the site itself for one reason or the other, not upset with the expert... it would allow JA better insight on what needs to be fixed as well.
We saw that a few years ago when moderators were reviewing for bogus negatives..
80 or 90% were not the fault if the expert... but customers complaining about credit card charges they did not understand, or pop ups of various sorts, or difficulty navigating the site.... or a drunken rant of one sort or the other.
At least we should know the reason.
Targeting the expert hurts morale, and expert retention, and that hurts everyone, including JA...
Many of the questions that go cold, with no answer, are the result of the expert not wanting to take the chance of getting a negative on a problem situation that we can see coming.